Contrasting and biased content is often allowed to persist on their platforms, creating and changing social attitudes. Some internal Facebook studies show that the company allowed the spread of false information about former US President Barack Obama. Posts were posted stating that Obama was born outside the US in Kenya.
Sources wrote that because of this, he could not become the President of America. Similar information was kept without any error correction.
Such controversial content on its platforms attracted users and gave it advertising support. There is doubt and uncertainty about the future of Facebook.
It is said that some US senators are in favor of dividing the company into small pieces The papers also show that Facebook handled “inflammatory” content in the Indian context and could have caused a major uproar at the top level.
.Multiple revelations about the company’s internal documents and sensitive material exchanges raise questions about the enormous potential of such mischief offered by these technology platforms.
The question arises whether social media companies should adopt some rules and regulations or these companies should discuss the limitations of free speech on their own merits and demerits.
These are fundamental questions in the context of freedom of expression and the right to publish and broadcast content that can have deep social implications.
mutually on their platforms. While more details are emerging about Facebook’s mistake in not controlling conversations and harmful posts, the company is working to rename itself and start afresh. Damage to the credibility of the company Has arrived and questions are being raised on its credibility.
Now on a policy level, the question is being seriously asked about the future of Facebook. It should be split or it should be normalized with one or the other name change. But be allowed to do his job.
Due to the huge number of its users, Facebook takes billions of dollars of advertisements on its platform.
Facebook has conducted several prosecuting research and handling of subversive content. Facebook video clips, for example, show how some of Trump’s supporters discussed a massive crowd-mobilization plan on the US Capitol Hill, where the country’s legislature is located.
.It’s potential to cause mischief and its active role in causing America’s Capitol Hill trouble was first reported by an insider “whistleblower”. Francis Huygens, a Facebook employee, called those sensitive internal studies of the company. Copied and photographed, in which it was explained how the company was handling sensitive posts of supporters of Donald Trump. The Huygens Leaks and much other such information about the company’s potential is being published by a group of 17 newspapers and news organizations in America.
.Francis Huygens was also summoned by the US Congress to submit his submissions regarding the company’s internal findings. The controversy continues to escalate and has now become a major global controversy.
.Due to the technological advancement and huge popularity of these social media platforms, their influence is at its peak. These companies and their platforms are now parallel providers of news.
Contrasting and biased content is often allowed to persist on their platforms, creating and changing social attitudes. Some internal Facebook studies show that the company allowed the spread of false information about former US President Barack Obama. Posts were posted stating that Obama was born outside the US in Kenya.
Sources wrote that because of this, he could not become the President of America. Similar information was kept without any error correction. Such controversial content on its platforms attracted users and gave it advertising support. There is doubt and uncertainty about the future of Facebook. It is said that some US senators are in favor of dividing the company into small pieces.